Reading Flannery O'Connor in Community
This past week, I had
the pleasure of being part of a week-long seminar on the writing of Flannery O’Connor. The seminar was sponsored by the
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at Azusa Pacific University, where I teach
writing. The deans of our college are interested in helping faculty to continue
a project of life-long learning, building community, and generally becoming more literate.
Every weekday morning,
we met and discussed O’Connor’s work, which is challenging, to say the least.
She is held up by Evangelicals especially as an important Christian writer, but
I once again found myself wondering how much of her work was meant to be taken
as “Christian” writing. It seemed that some sort of interpretation was needed.
But this is what made
for the robust and interesting discussions all week, which hadn’t flagged by
Friday morning. If anything, the people I talked with seemed to be saying that
they needed to read more of her work and think more about the questions her
fiction raised. This is, again, all to the good. A fiction writer is worth
reading if that is one conclusion she leads readers to make.
What We Mean When We Talk About Goodness
Certainly, too many of us today think quite differently. We
think that the meaning of something should be apparent, and if we don’t get
something in the first five minutes of staring at it, then it isn’t worth more of our time. We like easy fiction. Just look at what passes for
block-buster movies these days.
With O’Connor’s
fiction, it was interesting to see us jumping to ready-made
conclusions—ideas we’d already thought about—when a careful reading of a
passage did not support that common-place conclusion. If anything, it resisted
that and forced us to more careful reading.
The first time, for
example, we encountered the words “good man” in the short story with that in its title, this was not an occasion in which what a character was endorsing as “goodness”
was the same as the author’s view. In fact, by the end of the
story, the word “good” had been used to name conflicting
ideas. If anything was clear, it was that the characters in this story,
perhaps like the story’s readers, didn’t know what they were talking about when
they used words like “good man” or “good country people.” What, then, did these terms mean?
This is Just the Beginning
O’Connor’s stories,
like all good stories, like so much of the Bible, stays with us like a tough
experience. We think about it later, and it deepens our understanding in some
way.
And having other people
to work through so many of these issues was helpful.
I see why people join
book clubs. Thank you to the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at APU for
creating one out of the faculty. Reading seems a solitary venture, but at its
best it does connect us with community and with our deepest concerns.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home