Don’t Let The Brokenness Fool You
Many passages in the Bible, as
St. Augustine once noted, are difficult to understand. They require interpretation.
He, for example, read many Old Testament stories allegorically.
Certain other passages in the Bible
are so familiar that I simply read over their complexities.
If we're honest, most of the books, poems, and stories we read are like this. Reading is a struggle between strange passages difficult to interpret and overly familiar passages that wind up in quotation books and appear every other week in Facebook postings.
If we're honest, most of the books, poems, and stories we read are like this. Reading is a struggle between strange passages difficult to interpret and overly familiar passages that wind up in quotation books and appear every other week in Facebook postings.
I Corinthians 13 certainly is familiar, maybe too familiar. Serious atheists I have known are not merely aware of it; they sometimes give it more consideration than Christians do. Casual, busy
people who don't read much hear it frequently enough at weddings.
Even if we don’t remember its
sense, most of us can at least remember its cadences. As with “It was the
best of times, it was the worst of times…,” the
opening to Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities, we also remember “Love is patient, love is kind…”
Love is a Song...
I Corinthians 13 is so familiar that it almost no longer seems to apply. Try as I
might to really hear the words and not just the rhythms, I generally tune both out and experience that same frustration I get when hearing a song I am sick-to-death of hearing again.
I am not patient. I am not
kind. I replay wrongs, and I regularly don't trust people. And most of the time, nobody I know notices this about me, because we're all pretty much going down the same river.
I have begun to suspect
that what St. Paul describes is the mark of an otherworldly consciousness. My problem might be my own lack
of imagination in dealing with it, in the way I view the world, and in my dealings with the people around me.
In the best of times, to quote Dickens,
I like people. And, for some reason that seems so alien to my own thought processes that I can only call it illumination, I also sometimes
sense that the people around me, regardless of what they can and can’t do for
me, are limitless with potential. As a writer, I love the way the people I know surprise me.
But in the worst of times—most of the time, that is—I sense the brokenness among us, and I live in my own brokenness in fear.
This fear requires a nervous imagination, even failure
of it.
A Life of Paradox
When these new
possibilities spelled out in I Corinthians 13 get read out-loud, if I don't tune them out, I get twisted with the suspicion they must result from an
involvement with God I don't have: Someone's imagination is inspired to the point of seeing in paradoxes. They accept opposites: they love with the understanding of others' brokenness, that is, their
contradictory, paradoxical uselessness and their being made in the alien image of God as targets of sacrificial love.
Most of the time, my thoughts are practical and run toward nihilism: How will this person benefit me? How do I get the most for me out of this situation?
But when I think about the paradoxes, I suspect that all this brokenness is some sort of a clue. With the wild stuff about incarnation, it is
possible to see that there is more to that biblical figure "your neighbor" than meets the eye.
It is my current suspicion that those who consider and act on the needs and qualities in
others are among the most imaginative of people I could possibly meet.
Love is patient, kind, and takes an imagination.
Works Cited
Augustine. On
Christian Doctrine. Trans. J.F. Shaw. Chicago:
Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
Labels: biblical interpretation, love, paradox
11 Comments:
I agree that the familiarity of Scripture has a way of lightening the subject. Jesus came to heal our brokenness. I am reading Who is That Man? by John Ortberg, and while falling in love with Jesus all over again, I have new convictions about everything. Like you, I don't want to lose the value of God's word but for it to live in me so others will experience God's love.
Blessings
Good points, Sue. Familiarity breeds contempt, as they say. We read and think we know something, when what we know is our own prejudices, not what Jesus is doing in us. Thanks.
Question: Who started the use of "brokenness" as a way to refer to our human condition?
Were we at one time whole and later someone dropped us (OOPS) from on high?
I'm old fashioned. I still use "sin" and "sinfulness" to describe our human state.
Gary Olsen-Hasek
Gary, I agree that the terms we use matter. I'm simply trying to put things in terms of the way we experience them, and I'm trying to look at what may be the same old problem from a different angle. I'm not trying to write any new theology. Thanks for the good points.
I agree that "sin" is a term that people avoid too much these days, but I don't see that term as synonymous with "brokenness." Sin may be part of brokenness, but brokenness is not ONLY sin. Brokenness may also be the cruelty that has happened to us, the ways we have been damaged, the limitations we have, the narrowness of perspective, etc.
I was teaching part of 1 Corinthians 13 at church recently, and I put long pauses between each of the statements. Love is patient...Love is kind.... It seemed much harder to live up to that long definition of love when we looked at each statement carefully.
Yes. Well said.
Joe, I agree. Though I've tended to see "sin" as at the root of all brokenness (for me, anyway), brokenness may also be the result of the other things you mention.
I tend to see my own autonomy as the root of all brokenness. Well, mine and yours. I tend to see the "will" as the root - not what we do with it ("sin") but its very existence.
This is important, Caroline. Autonomy is held out as important for mental healthy, usually, but I see your point--autonomy as complete separation from human relationships, perhaps? And our very wills--the existence of them--is sin?
I'm not a theologian, but I'd guess that redemption then concerns transforming our wills so that we want and will what God does. These are important considerations.
Yes, I think. The need to be separate, to be an "I," to be "something." But I don't know about the existence of the will being sin. Maybe it opens up room for sin?
I think I see it as a gift that we are not supposed to accept. But we have to be taught that. We have to learn that we don't want it.
Nor am I, but I'd guess something along those lines as well.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home